Fax: (212) 242 5718 mail@meretzusa.org
Between Haiti and Israel
The importance of this week's top Israeli news stories seems to pale in comparison with the humanitarian catastrophe in Haiti, and the urgent relief effort there.
As a result, I discarded the idea of writing about the intentional
humiliation of Turkey's ambassador to Israel at the hands of Avigdor
Lieberman's Foreign Ministry. Any other
week, perhaps, the crude, highhanded bungling of a not-unreasonable Israeli
diplomatic protest by Lieberman and his deputy, Danny Ayalon (and the public
reprimand of them by President Shimon Peres) would
have been fodder for discussion in this column.
Just not this week.
And I've also chosen not to write at length on remarks made on Tuesday by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, who seemed to deflate recent hopes about an imminent return to negotiations. In a statement issued by his bureau, the Prime Minister denied reports that he had come to an agreement with Egypt on declaring Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian state, maintaining instead that Israel would never compromise on "united Jerusalem". Netanyahu's denial caused Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Ali Aboul Gheit to reverse his previously upbeat assessment of the situation.
But two Israel-related aspects of the tragedy in Haiti are
worthy of note. On the positive side of
the ledger, Israel responded swiftly to the crisis, dispatching an IDF medical aid mission
to Port-au-Prince. Israel's efforts
should not be surprising: The country has a long and praiseworthy tradition
of helping in areas stricken by disaster, and its humanitarian response is a justified
point of pride for Israeli citizens.
On the other hand, I was struck this week by the eerie
resemblance between televangelist Pat Robertson's commentary on Haiti, and the
reaction to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 by Rabbi Ovadia Yosef - the spiritual
overlord of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party in Israel.
For the few who haven't heard, Robertson blamed the Haitian earthquake
on that nation's supposed "pact
with the devil", dating - he claimed - from the early 19th
century. Now compare this to Yosef's
treatment of Katrina four years ago: "There was a tsunami and there are
terrible natural disasters, because there isn't enough Torah study... black
people reside there (in New Orleans). Blacks will study the Torah? (God said)
let's bring a tsunami and drown them. Hundreds of thousands remained homeless.
Tens of thousands have been killed. All of this because they have no God."
Yesterday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs summarily
dismissed such remarks as merely "stupid" - but the problem goes deeper and the
danger is greater. Robertson and Yosef,
after all, are not cloistered eccentrics, but leaders of large and influential
movements in their respective countries.
And their theodical explanations of natural disaster are not idle
ravings, but a harsh dehumanizing force that pins blame on the victim, hardens
the heart of their followers, and desensitizes them to human suffering anywhere
outside their circle.
This is not meant as a knock on religion, which certainly
can - and does - serve as a civilizing and moral force in many places around
the world. But in an age when Western
eyes are so continuously directed at the dangers of fundamentalism within
Islam, it is worth remembering that Christians and Jews, Americans and Israelis
have to pay careful attention to their own religious fanatics as well.
I wish "Godspeed" for the recovery efforts in Haiti and a
Shabbat Shalom for all.
Ron Skolnik
Executive Director
Meretz USA

